2050: Believe it or not this will be our future

                 

None of us can deny this picture.  The pollution that we are dealing with today exactly indicates that this is going to be our  future, if steps are not taken to control it. 

So, like our summer,winter & festive beak now, are we waiting for 'The Pollution Breaks' to happen in future?? 

Well most of the schools are closed which is a happy news for some kids.  But these are not the holidays to sit peacefully at home and enjoy. 

It is a big question mark on our future. And we all know that the future is going to be depend on how seriously we are going to take these few upcoming years. 

Well it is not just our future which is in threat but it is the future of each and every organism living on this planet. 

What's the solution then? 

Let's just sit at home. Or maybe blame the government for whatsoever is happening in this world. 

Can we do that??

Offcourse! it's easiest way to evade from the reality..but let's just close our eyes and count how many trees have we actually planted? 

1..2...3..4.. Maybe 10...20..or maybe more. 

Actually the answer lies in your number. 

We all know this answer is very simple and this simple answer can save you,  me and everyone of us.  

This simple answer has the key to our bright future. 

Let's grab this key to open the doors to our beautiful future...

For the foreseeable future, Earth is our best home and we need to discover a way to live on it sustainably. It appears clean that that requires scaling back our consumption, specially a transition to low-carbon lifestyles, and improving the repute of women global. Most effective whilst we have completed this stuff can we absolutely be capable of estimate what number of human beings our planet can sustainably keep.

In the early 20th Century, the global population problem was as much about the fertility of soil as the fertility of women. George Knibbs, in his 1928 book The Shadow of the World's Future, suggested that if global population reached 7.8 billion, there would have to be much more efficient use of its surface.

Normally, is there a examine relating to the impact deforestation has on our planets capacity to “scrub” CO2? The studies you referenced on the charge of CO2 dissipation over time could possibly be faulty because our planets capability to easy itself is being destroyed simultaneously whilst carbon emissions increase. 

Simply thinking if that fact is accounted for in those 3 research. Secondly, why become fossil gas so focussed on (in phrases of planetary impact and carbon emissions) even as animal agriculture not referred to? Truely placed, the propagation of livestock money owed for extra emissions, greater deforestation, extra desertification, and usually greater impact than any other unmarried supply.

The UN population Fund has calculated that 350 million women in the poorest international locations did now not want their final child, however did no longer have the means to prevent from being pregnant. If these ladies's desires had been met, it'd have a enormous effect on global population. In keeping with this reasoning, developing a sustainable population is as a great deal about boosting women's rights as it's far approximately decreasing intake of assets.

"It isn't always the quantity of human beings in the world that is the difficulty – however the quantity of clients and the scale and nature of their consumption," says David Satterthwaite, a senior fellow on the international Institute for environment and improvement in London. He charges Gandhi: "the world has enough for every body's want, but no longer enough for all people's greed."

Because it stands now, even though, the world's populace is over 7.3 billion. In step with United nations predictions it is able to reach 9.7 billion people with the aid of 2050, and over eleven billion via 2100.

The analysis confirmed that household customers are responsible for greater than 60% of the globe's greenhouse fuel emissions, and as much as 80% of the world's land, fabric and water use. What is more, the researchers observed that the footprints are unevenly allotted throughout regions, with wealthier international locations generating the most affects in line with household.

Even though the ones changes occur, it seems not likely that our planet ought to truely sustain a populace of 11 billion. So Steffen shows that we have to stabilise the worldwide population, optimistically at around 9 billion, and then begin an extended, gradual fashion of lowering population. Which means lowering fertility costs.

It will then require hundreds and hundreds more years for its entire absorption thru the natural weather cycle. As Archer places it, “the climatic impacts of releasing fossil gas C02 to the surroundings will last longer than Stonehenge, longer than time tablets, longer than nuclear waste”.

My role is sincerely that we act when we grasping the fact, and the whole truth. The danger of course is that if we don’t seize the entire ramifications of our failure to solve this disaster nowadays, then our solutions will not be of the size this is wanted, and that they wont be deployed unexpectedly sufficient (as is presently the problem).

In other phrases, regardless of the mitigation efforts of destiny civilisations, climate change is here to stay. Simplest after this extraordinarily lengthy period of pressured warming — a long way greater than the records of contemporary civilisation since the clinical Revolution — will weather exchange slowly begin to ‘reverse’ and the planet will at final embark on a cooling trajectory, the report explains.

Ultimately the real determinant is how we pick out to run our society. If a few or anybody consume numerous resources, the maximum sustainable populace could be decrease. If we discover ways to every devour less, ideally with out sacrificing our creature comforts, Earth will be able to support more of us.

The tendencies are so deeply set, he says, that even a dramatic catastrophe might not alternate their course. In a 2014 observe, Bradshaw concluded that if two billion human beings died tomorrow – or if each government adopted debatable fertility regulations which includes China's lately-ended one-toddler policy – there would still be as many if no longer extra human beings on the planet by way of 2100 as there are today.

Without a doubt, any binary “this vs that” technique isn’t realistically going to suffice. We need both/and, software program and hardware collectively, in varying proportions as necessitated by the realities of our numerous interests, dispositions, and predilections. I definitely trust you on that.

The planet is the closing ‘international commons’. It belongs to neither a particular person nor a selected state. Nor does it belong to a unmarried technology which include us, our youngsters or our grandchildren. Alternatively, it belongs to all residing creatures each alive now and in the future. Just as all of humanity is hooked up ‘horizontally’ throughout the globe, so too are all past and destiny existence forms certain ‘vertically’ in a chronic unfolding of the tale of existence.

Population increase has been so rapid that there is no real precedent we can flip to for clues about the feasible consequences. In other words, even as the planet may maintain over eleven billion human beings with the aid of the give up of the century, our cutting-edge degree of know-how does not allow us to predict whether or not one of these massive population is sustainable, actually because it has never befell before.

Within the few a long time for the reason that human beings first ventured out into space, our objectives have jumped from simple stargazing to the dwelling far from Earth and inhabiting different planets. Many eminent thinkers, including physicist Stephen Hawking, say colonising different worlds is essential for the closing survival of our species.

A 2012 UN document summarised 65 exceptional anticipated maximum sustainable populace sizes. The most common estimate turned into eight billion, a little large than the present day populace. But the estimates ranged from as few as two billion to, in a single take a look at, a mind-blowing 1,024 billion.

As an instance, clients inside the west may argue that international locations that produce many purchaser goods, such as China, need to take duty for the emissions had to lead them to. Ivanova and her colleagues argue the purchasers themselves are simply as accountable. "If we change our consumption behavior, this will have a drastic impact on our environmental footprint as nicely."

With this geological mayhem scheduled to take region over the following several thousand years, the selections that we are making (read: no longer making) within the present tackle a brand new light. Honestly we need to expand the time scale with which we determine the full implications of the climate disaster beyond the modern-day century. As soon as humans flip up the planetary thermostat by using 2°C (the goal to which the international network is devoted at present, albeit very with a bit of luck), there could be no turning it again, keep a fashion closer to planet-altering geo-engineering.

As may be visible from the graph below, displaying estimates from three exceptional models, it takes numerous centuries for the oceans to absolutely respond to a warmer climate and altered carbon balance. As a end result, the carbon that we're freeing into the atmosphere these days is inside the system of ‘programming’ a capability 2-five metres of sea stage upward thrust by using across the year 2300.

If we go through these facts in details.

We will know how much important it is for us to protect our planet. We can bring a big change if we all shift to a sustainable lifestyle.